Started By
Message
re: Will Texas A&M be better without Mond?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:18 pm to Dr RC
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:18 pm to Dr RC
quote:
There are only a couple of dolts
Well unfortunately they all seem to flock to this website.
quote:
However, many of us do think that he has the potential to be much better overall once he gets his feet wet.
I’m not arguing against this. I’m just pointing out the likelihood of immediate production next season is not historically high.
I guess I just find this question a little nonsensical. Texas A&M will likely miss Mond to some degree next season, but he’s a senior QB and that’s usually how it goes. That doesn’t mean their next QB will not be better - it’s just how experience works. Burrow wasn’t LSU’s savior his first year as a transfer either.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 2:19 pm
1
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:32 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
Aside from the JFF years the backup QB has always been the most popular player on the team. Our fans always think the backup would do better than the starter and our coach is an idiot and is playing the wrong guy.
Thats not even limited to QB either. Every time a player makes a mistake, people start questioning why so and so 3rd string isn't playing.
I think this is a function of having terrible coaches for 20 years. We don't trust our coaches to determine who should play.
Thats not even limited to QB either. Every time a player makes a mistake, people start questioning why so and so 3rd string isn't playing.
I think this is a function of having terrible coaches for 20 years. We don't trust our coaches to determine who should play.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News