Started By
Message
re: Will Texas A&M be better without Mond?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:10 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:10 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
There are only a couple of dolts who think King would have been better as a true freshman than Mond as a senior. Nobody with a half a brain would have made him the starter.
However, many of us do think that he has the potential to be much better overall once he gets his feet wet.
However, many of us do think that he has the potential to be much better overall once he gets his feet wet.
2
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:15 pm to Dr RC
Exactly, RS Fish King will be better than Mond by the end of the year. But, as I stated before there will be hiccups at the start of the season. Good thing we don't play any teams that are remotely decent until at least Arkansas ...
Posted on 1/17/21 at 2:18 pm to Dr RC
quote:
There are only a couple of dolts
Well unfortunately they all seem to flock to this website.
quote:
However, many of us do think that he has the potential to be much better overall once he gets his feet wet.
I’m not arguing against this. I’m just pointing out the likelihood of immediate production next season is not historically high.
I guess I just find this question a little nonsensical. Texas A&M will likely miss Mond to some degree next season, but he’s a senior QB and that’s usually how it goes. That doesn’t mean their next QB will not be better - it’s just how experience works. Burrow wasn’t LSU’s savior his first year as a transfer either.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 2:19 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News