re: The new “opt out” bowls

quote:

---

Please read what I wrote before you respond. This is a discussion board.

---

I did read and I did respond. I thought we were discussing. I just don't understand why you think 2 vs. 7 would be any different than 1 vs. 4? It would be worse, more than likely. If 1 vs. 4 is bad, why is 2 vs. 7 going to be better?

You said you listed what would have been matchups the past few years and they looked good. They all look good until the games are played. that is when the blow outs happen. Most of the 1 vs. 4 games looked fine until they got on the field.

Maybe I am not understanding you. But I sure don't understand why if you add less talented teams to the mix why y'all think the games are going to get magically better.

quote:

---

My whole point was the 1v4 game isn't the barometer, and nobody says 1v8 will consistently be competitive.

---

If 1 vs. 4 is a blow out 6 out of 7 years, why would 1 vs. 8 be good at any point? It wouldn't be competitive at any point more than likely. That has been my whole point. Y'all keep saying 1 vs. 8 won't be competitive consistently....crap. 1 vs 4 is not competitive but you apparently believe 1 vs. 8 will be competitive at all?

Maybe your logic just escapes me.

1 vs. 4 is not competitive but 1 vs. 8 might be!