Started By
Message
re: Brian Harsin: By the numbers
Posted on 12/23/20 at 12:52 am to BoarEd
Posted on 12/23/20 at 12:52 am to BoarEd
quote:Again, you are saying that BSU should be head and shoulders above the rest of their conference because, and I quote: " Of course he is going to recruit better than them. Boise, Idaho is the only city worth a damn throughout the entire region."
I don't give a shite where they're getting their talent. What I'm saying is that frickin San Diego and Honolulu are not in the same region as Boise, Idaho. I would imagine they're pulling talent from Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, Utah, and Northern California mostly.
Aren't you implying that recruits from "Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, Utah, and Northern California mostly" are flocking to BSU because of the lure of the big-city charms of Boise, Idaho?
You're arguing yourself into a corner. I'll make it simple: You believe Harsin is a shitty coach despite his .780 winning percentage because - why, exactly?
Posted on 12/23/20 at 11:04 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
I'll make it simple: You believe Harsin is a shitty coach despite his .780 winning percentage because - why, exactly?
Find a post of me saying that Hardin is a shitty coach. I never said that. I said it was a bad hire, but that doesn't mean he is a shitty coach.
With the advantages he had over his peers at Boise, you guys needed a guy who won more like 85% of his games if you intend to compete with Sabans. I doubt Harsin lasts more than 3 years for you guys.
Sure, he will win you some games, but he will be spanked by Sabans every time. He will lose to other teams around the league as well. As we all know, beating Sabans is the metric your decision makers use.
This post was edited on 12/23/20 at 11:15 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)