Started By
Message
re: Is LSU a blue blood? Is Georgia?
Posted on 10/22/20 at 12:10 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 10/22/20 at 12:10 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Nebraska, on the other hand, hasn't won a conference championship since 1999.
I missed the Nebraska part of your post. Sorry.
Nebraska has won legitimate National Championships in 1995, 1996 and 1998 not to mention 1970 and 1971. Legit national Championships mean more than Conference Championships for me.
Again. USCs last legit National Championship was 1979.
now if you want to make conference championships more important, then maybe Georgia should be considered a Blue Blood.
Also consider if we wipe out USCs 2003 and 2004 years because of cheating (which we should) then they had 4 really good years where they finished in the top 5....very similar to what Georgia is doing right now.
I would not claim that Georgia is dominating college football based on that, though.
This post was edited on 10/22/20 at 2:47 pm
1
Posted on 10/22/20 at 4:18 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I missed the Nebraska part of your post. Sorry.
Nebraska has won legitimate National Championships in 1995, 1996 and 1998 not to mention 1970 and 1971. Legit national Championships mean more than Conference Championships for me.
Again. USCs last legit National Championship was 1979.
now if you want to make conference championships more important, then maybe Georgia should be considered a Blue Blood.
Also consider if we wipe out USCs 2003 and 2004 years because of cheating (which we should) then they had 4 really good years where they finished in the top 5....very similar to what Georgia is doing right now.
I would not claim that Georgia is dominating college football based on that, though.
What makes a title “legit” in your eyes?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News