Started By
Message

re: ACC's +1 Vrs. SEC's Conf. Only

Posted on 8/1/20 at 5:30 pm to
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42687 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

I thought their +1 was for this...but I see your point.


If it had just been +1 it would've worked but they put a provision into it saying that the +1 had to be in-state.
Posted by PeeJayScammedGT
Kennesaw, GA
Member since Oct 2019
2148 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

If it had just been +1 it would've worked but they put a provision into it saying that the +1 had to be in-state.

Due to CV19 The ACC Conference Office takes the legal pressure off of the individual Athl Depts, by putting that stipulation in about the in-State OoC games, the ACC Office made it harder for OoC cupcakes to sue for breach of Contract for cancelling games while still preserving the Rivalry Weekend Games, the trouble is , is that the SEC Commish was too stupid to play along

If you play 10 or 11 games and the Conference Office doesn't put that stipulation in about the OoC being in State a lot of Cupcakes are gonna sue claiming that if you can play 10 you could've played our School and paid us our "appearance fee"

The ACC Commish is playing Chess while the SEC Commish is playing Checkers
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter