Started By
Message
re: Why was LSU football so bad in the '90s?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 6:14 pm to dchog
Posted on 5/5/20 at 6:14 pm to dchog
Arkansas still leads the series with A&M by a considerable margin even after losing the last 8, so I'd say yall are a much better program for than A&M historically. Maybe if both Ark and UT had been strong in the early 90s the SWC would've been in a position of strength with the Big Eight. The Hogs have had higher highs and lower lows than the Aggy since the SWC.
1
Posted on 5/5/20 at 7:40 pm to Mithridates6
Both schools have similar histories. A&M has the advantage these last eight years as they have played the worst razorback teams since the 50s and 40s.
Arkansas was never going to cooperate with Texas or any Texas school as Arkansas was treated as an outsider. So the destruction of the SWC was inevitable. Arkansas was blamed for it's failure but it was the only school besides Rice that wasn't on probation.
Arkansas was never going to cooperate with Texas or any Texas school as Arkansas was treated as an outsider. So the destruction of the SWC was inevitable. Arkansas was blamed for it's failure but it was the only school besides Rice that wasn't on probation.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News