Started By
Message
re: SEC HC rankings
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:26 pm to ibldprplgld
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:26 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
And you're acting like participation trophies count in college football.
Nope, never once said anything remotely like that. Only that it's part of the job so it's retarded not to include in in the ranking.
quote:
Inputs don't matter. Only outputs.
And you can't get the outputs without the inputs which you keep ignoring.
quote:
Dabo Swinney. He wasn't recruiting lights out until very, very recently. Yet he has two national titles to show for it. He does more with less.
Nope, but he recruited a great qb in Watson who he wouldn't have won a championship without. But somehow that fact escapes you.
Coaches should be ranked by the total package which has a ton of variable. Otherwise coaches like Stoops and Mullen(had he stayed at MSU) would never be ranked fairly because they are probably never going to win at those places but they're some of the better coaches in the league.
2
Posted on 3/28/20 at 2:50 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Coaches get too much credit when they win and too much blame when they lose.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:04 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Nope, never once said anything remotely like that. Only that it's part of the job so it's retarded not to include in in the ranking.
It is included already: in the output. If a coach doesn't win trophies, how he recruits doesn't matter. You want some kind of additional commendation for recruiting but it's already baked into the entire package: winning is the only thing that matters.
quote:
And you can't get the outputs without the inputs which you keep ignoring.
You just proved my whole point. Recruiting is only an input, not an output. The only thing that matters is the output.
quote:
Coaches should be ranked by the total package which has a ton of variable.
Coaches are ranked by winning. Period.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News