Started By
Message
re: Honestly, who was a better hire at the time on paper? Orgeron or Pittman?
Posted on 12/9/19 at 11:39 pm to Goldtide1
Posted on 12/9/19 at 11:39 pm to Goldtide1
The argument for O is that he had just come off 2 very successful interim stints at big time programs.
The argument for Pittman is that he never got a chance to fail
Miserably.
That being said LSU is in a better position to succeed making this kind of hire.
Neither is bringing the Xs and Os to the table. But LSU already had aranda. They aren’t building a program from
The ground up.
Hiring Pittman at Arkansas is more like hiring O at Ole Miss.
The argument for Pittman is that he never got a chance to fail
Miserably.
That being said LSU is in a better position to succeed making this kind of hire.
Neither is bringing the Xs and Os to the table. But LSU already had aranda. They aren’t building a program from
The ground up.
Hiring Pittman at Arkansas is more like hiring O at Ole Miss.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News