Started By
Message
re: The Illusion of Success: Gus Malzahn's Offensive Rankings
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:18 pm to momentoftruth87
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:18 pm to momentoftruth87
The primary advantage of Petrino over Malzahn?
Cost and replaceability.
Gus Malzahn will want $7m per year, a large buyout and will be here a minimum of 5 seasons. 5 seasons that I expect would have a record around .500 with a 9-4 being his ceiling.
Bobby Petrino would cost us $1m to $2m with a small buyout and would be easy to replace without a dramatic ordeal. I expect he would also finish with about the same record as Gus, perhaps better.
Petrino is better with less talent than Gus is. I don't think that Gus can handle our situation talent wise.
Now.. I don't particularly want either one of them. A younger guy who has a chance to actually build the Arkansas program is what's needed.
Cost and replaceability.
Gus Malzahn will want $7m per year, a large buyout and will be here a minimum of 5 seasons. 5 seasons that I expect would have a record around .500 with a 9-4 being his ceiling.
Bobby Petrino would cost us $1m to $2m with a small buyout and would be easy to replace without a dramatic ordeal. I expect he would also finish with about the same record as Gus, perhaps better.
Petrino is better with less talent than Gus is. I don't think that Gus can handle our situation talent wise.
Now.. I don't particularly want either one of them. A younger guy who has a chance to actually build the Arkansas program is what's needed.
1
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:19 pm to Killean
We have the 97th ranked recruiting class right now, who fixes that quicker? Petrino or Gus? Regardless of what you guys think Gus is a name that gets recruits attention. Petrino is one that is toxic and will make recruiting 100X more difficult
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 12:20 pm
Page 1 of 1
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News