Started By
Message
re: Bruce James - " Chad gets at least 4 years"
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:08 pm to STLhog
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:08 pm to STLhog
quote:
He straight up fired Mike Anderson on the spot for walking into his office at the end of last season and saying "we'll be fine" when he asked Mike for an actual plan.
I get mike won a few SEC games but what did he do with all the time he had. I hate to say it, but Chad works harder than Mike did.
I get Mike was "one of us", but sry, my newborn is more aggressive than Mike was. Its terrible when you don't make the NIT or even field of 64. Football takes time and it is proven that longevity is better than rinse and repeat.
Bring on the hate.
2
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:20 pm to momentoftruth87
well, well, now... Damn! Ya shoot from both hips bud.
Either way, both need/ed to be gone at this point. I am off the Morris wagon and until we beat someone we shouldn't.. An SEC team that we surprise, I will stay off.
If he somehow wins against Miss State, and Mizzou... perhaps. If not, he needs to be shown the door period.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:38 pm to momentoftruth87
Let's trash the Mike Anderson comparison and the BS political crap that it brings with it.
First off - Mike Anderson was not a bad coach. I'm not even going to use the dumb arse cliche of calling him a mediocre coach. He was a good coach but he wasn't building anything. If he steadily built us to somewhere - dipped a little - but then climbed back then I'd say he deserved more time. But he didn't.
Anderson had ample time here. He lost too many instate recruits. He failed to develop any type of consistency. He wasted Gafford - look at how the NBA is using him = pick and mf'n roll damn it.
The comparison to Anderson and Morris is dumb.
First off Morris is nowhere near as good as Anderson. It's an insult to compare the two. However, Morris has only been here 1.whatever years so this idea that Morris hasn't been fired due to his skin color is f'n idiotic. Morris needs to be fired and fired soon but it has nothing to do with skin color. Same thing when dumbasses compare MA to DVH.
DVH is still here because he gets the state's best recruits. He also get's to at least the sweet 16 (super regional play) and has us in position to be in the CWS if not win it. Not to mention he has elevated us to being considered the #3 program in the nation as of today. If Mike did any of those things.....heck - if he got us to ONE - just one f'n sweet 16 he would still be here today.
Skin color has nothing to do with it.
First off - Mike Anderson was not a bad coach. I'm not even going to use the dumb arse cliche of calling him a mediocre coach. He was a good coach but he wasn't building anything. If he steadily built us to somewhere - dipped a little - but then climbed back then I'd say he deserved more time. But he didn't.
Anderson had ample time here. He lost too many instate recruits. He failed to develop any type of consistency. He wasted Gafford - look at how the NBA is using him = pick and mf'n roll damn it.
The comparison to Anderson and Morris is dumb.
First off Morris is nowhere near as good as Anderson. It's an insult to compare the two. However, Morris has only been here 1.whatever years so this idea that Morris hasn't been fired due to his skin color is f'n idiotic. Morris needs to be fired and fired soon but it has nothing to do with skin color. Same thing when dumbasses compare MA to DVH.
DVH is still here because he gets the state's best recruits. He also get's to at least the sweet 16 (super regional play) and has us in position to be in the CWS if not win it. Not to mention he has elevated us to being considered the #3 program in the nation as of today. If Mike did any of those things.....heck - if he got us to ONE - just one f'n sweet 16 he would still be here today.
Skin color has nothing to do with it.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News