Started By
Message

re: Comparing Alabama offensive coordinators, Sark, Locks, Dabol, Kiffin

Posted on 9/20/19 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
17002 posts
Posted on 9/20/19 at 4:18 pm to
So not to jump in on your discussion let me pose this:

A fake is a fake regardless if the opposition believes it. Would a strong run game make it more believable or not? Or does it freeze everyone for a flash? Maybe both, maybe one. However, I think everyone or most everyone is going to freeze and wait to see. Even Clemson, if you watch their games do it, that’s almost natural. So to answer the question, a fake is a fake and still has the effect give or take experience on the defense, success in the game etc. just my .10 cents.
Posted by John Milner
Member since Jan 2015
6560 posts
Posted on 9/20/19 at 5:38 pm to
and play fake is just an indicator that the run game keeps the defense honest. How many times have you heard commentators and coaches talk about keeping the defense honest? So a threat of a run obviously impacts the passing game at least to a degree, and the better the running game is, the more the defense will have to respect that. Likewise, a good passing game will help the running game. It's really a no brainer. Kind of hard to believe we're even debating this.

but as to the earlier, related point about the UA passing game, I agree that it's our best option. That too is kind of a no brainer with Tua and the best wide receiving corps in the nation.
This post was edited on 9/20/19 at 5:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter