Started By
Message

re: Saban's comments on the defense post-South Carolina

Posted on 9/17/19 at 12:48 pm to
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14343 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 12:48 pm to

quote:

I'm in agreement with you that an agressive stunting blitzing approach is the best formula for stopping drives by modern HUNH offenses. My only point was that Saban had a reason for not doing it much yet, that I do expect it to be implemented as the new young D-Front players get settled in, and therefore think it's premature to conclude that Golding is clueless and inept.




And maybe that's what we see next time out @TidalSurge1. But I'm telling the truth, you don't have to be a 5th-year Phi Beta Kappa, to go get the QB. You just have to be willing to turn loose of a bunch of 4* and 5* athletic freaks. Those we have plenty of.
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 1:16 pm to
Here's the deal, I'm not sure how much freedom Golding has. Saban is more conservative in his defensive philosophy which is why he and Kirby meshed well for so long. I think Pruitt came in with the understanding that he's the play caller and Saban actually let him loose. I don't think Golding has that clout, so we are seeing a more Kirby-esk defense because that's what Saban prefers.

That said, we do blitz some and we did blitz against Clemson last year. Problem is almost every time we blitzed they hit a big play. Go back and watch the game. I did and was surprised by how aggressive our D actually was at times that game. And guess what? I didn't work. At the end of the day, it appears to me most of these teams are doing super quick reads and passes. Meaning, that even if we do bring the house, we are very unlikely to get there before the ball is out. So why leave guys uncovered down the field if we know our blitz isn't going to have time to get home? It is a real dilemma and not nearly as simple as some of you are making it. Blitzing every play isn't going to kill the HUNH. If that was the key, our defense and every other defense would be doing exactly that.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

And maybe that's what we see next time out @TidalSurge1. But I'm telling the truth, you don't have to be a 5th-year Phi Beta Kappa, to go get the QB. You just have to be willing to turn loose of a bunch of 4* and 5* athletic freaks. Those we have plenty of.

Reportedly, Golding was agressive as a DC prior to coming to Bama. So for now, I'll be optimitic that he'll shift the front-7 play calling in that direction -- hopefully soon.

I agree that it's better for the front-7 to play fast (read & react) and agressively instead of having to think too much about what's my job entail on this defensive play call. But they can't just be told to play see QB get QB defense either, not without getting burned a lot.

But with that said, I think we generally agree. I definitely favor a front-7 scheme that isn't too complicated, so players don't have to learn and think so much, and instead can play fast in an agressive, attacking defense aimed at disrupting blocking schemes and getting quick penetration.

I think we benefit by being more complex in the secondary -- disguising coverages, sprinkling in blitzing DBs, etc. -- but even moreso if that's combined with a simpler front-7 scheme that's agressively attacking the backfield (not "mush rush"). That appeared to be our approach when Pruitt was DC. And iirc, it was very effective.
This post was edited on 9/18/19 at 6:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter