re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?

quote:

---

Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?

---

Do you have a link to me saying 1925 wasn't legitimate?

I said I would be ok with counting only the polls. Why? Because they are generally considered more legitimate than many of the others.

It's not even an important argument. Alabama has more national titles, at least since the 19th century, regardless how you count them.