Started By
Message
re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:34 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:34 pm to NYCAuburn
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
2
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:36 pm to John Milner
Vol fans don't like that site at all.
I wish it started with 1936 though and the AP because any poll before then was conducted retroactively. For example, the NCF (National Championship Foundation) didn't even exist until 1980.
I wish it started with 1936 though and the AP because any poll before then was conducted retroactively. For example, the NCF (National Championship Foundation) didn't even exist until 1980.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:18 pm to John Milner
quote:
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
You may be good with it but, it's no good. Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?
Just as football didn't start yesterday, football was played before polls were created and certain teams were acknowledged as having been the best.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News