Started By
Message

re: Slive did an amazing job, but why again did we rush into adding Mizzou?

Posted on 1/18/19 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by Front Office
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2018
1 post
Posted on 1/18/19 at 2:42 pm to
4. I actually know for a fact from an SEC staffer involved in the negotiations that up until the very last minute, the SEC was very close to extending the offer to Georgia Tech rather than Mizzou. They ultimately went with Mizzou.

This is inaccurate. Georgia Tech was not in the fold. Nor was West Virginia, which has been speculated. If in fact we did not get Missouri, our lone target at the time, we would have gone with a 13 school roster and done creative scheduling.
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
3909 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 2:57 pm to
Man I wish Mizzou had said no...They stock out like a sore thimb
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter