Started By
Message
re: Should targeting not be called on the field and let the replay officials decide?
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:30 pm to ibldprplgld
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:30 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
And honestly, the NCAA should be open to being more responsive to appeals for review of their rules throughout the season in cases where a rule has been clearly misapplied.
It wasn’t misapplied here though. By definition White’s hit WAS targeting and it’s already been reviewed and upheld by the league office. It certainly wasn’t a horrific hit, and prior to the rule it would have just been a roughing the passer foul, but as of 2016 it was now a targeting foul.
2
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:46 pm to droliver
quote:
It wasn’t misapplied here though. By definition White’s hit WAS targeting and it’s already been reviewed and upheld by the league office. It certainly wasn’t a horrific hit, and prior to the rule it would have just been a roughing the passer foul, but as of 2016 it was now a targeting foul.
Disagree 100% when you consider the spirit of the rule and the rampant inconsistency with which it's enforced.
Posted on 10/23/18 at 1:50 pm to droliver
quote:
It wasn’t misapplied here though
Even if it wasn't misapplied, if you are suspended from a game, I think there should be some sort of appeal process. I think they should be at least given the opportunity to have their case heard by a third party.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News