Started By
Message

re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods

Posted on 4/19/18 at 9:18 am to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59018 posts
Posted on 4/19/18 at 9:18 am to
quote:

I truly do not understand taking pride in something that happened waaaaaaaaaay before I was born


I am guessing you don't celebrate Christmas, 4th of July etc?

quote:

LSUs boxing titles really dont do it for me
And if they won a boxing title this year, would that title do it for you? No, because it is boxing, not because of the timeline.

But I agree with WG. Bluebloods are for teams who have had sustained success ove the years, not just a blip of a 10 year strong period.

Ohio State
Texas
USCw
Alabama
Notre Dame
Michigan
Oklahoma

I would say if Michigan and Texas does not break through to become a serious power again, they are in danger of losing Blueblood status. I can't thin of any other teams that really deserve being added o the group. There could be some teams considered to be second tier that, if they went on a sustained streak might be considered.

LSU
Florida
Auburn
Georgia
Nebraska (Dropped them from Blueblood for lack of any success lately)
Clemson (A long way to go, though)
Miami
FSU (Maybe closest)
Penn State
Tennessee (Very close but fading)

This post was edited on 4/19/18 at 9:21 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96658 posts
Posted on 4/19/18 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I am guessing you don't celebrate Christmas, 4th of July etc?

We are comparing holidays to me not caring about what lsu football did in 1958?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter