Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:37 am to Che Boludo
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:37 am to Che Boludo
quote:
On the cusp (no order, but Nebraska/UT seem the closest to meeting the criteria):
- Nebraska (only because they've recently fallen below the .700 win % threshold)
- UTenn
- Penn St
- UF
- Auburn
- LSU
- UGA
- FSU
- Miami
None of these teams will ever be blue bloods. Just not enough history. Your team's dominance has to go back to at least before WW2.
2
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:03 am to ColoBama
quote:
None of these teams will ever be blue bloods. Just not enough history. Your team's dominance has to go back to at least before WW2.
That would eliminate Oklahoma though.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:09 am to ColoBama
quote:
Your team's dominance has to go back to at least before WW2.
Complate garbage.So if Miami goes on to win 4 NC's in the next 15 years and has a total of 9,they won't be
a "blue blood"?
Lots of powerhouses pre WWII that will never sniff another NC (Minnesota,Pittsburgh,Army,Harvard,Princeton ) It was 75+ years ago and those titles are getting less significant over the course of time.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News