Started By
Message
re: So, why did the Iron Bowl take a 40 year break?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:54 pm to TheGusBus34
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:54 pm to TheGusBus34
According to Stassen.com, in the 40 years they didn't play, Alabama won 266 games, which amounts to 77% of the games they played, and was ranked #2 behind only Notre Dame for the time frame.
Auburn won 199 games, which was about 58%, ranking #74 in the nation, behind such notables as Brown, Louisiana Monroe, and San Jose State.
Auburn won 199 games, which was about 58%, ranking #74 in the nation, behind such notables as Brown, Louisiana Monroe, and San Jose State.
2
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:56 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
everyone knows that auburn is the only team to beat bama consistently...imagine if you played us during that span and how roles could easily been reversed...
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:58 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
Oh yeah, and The Iron Bowl was when the two teams played yearly at Legion Field in Birmingham, which was called The Steel City of the South.
It's not The Iron Bowl anymore.
It's not The Iron Bowl anymore.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News