Started By
Message

re: So, why did the Iron Bowl take a 40 year break?

Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20744 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Auburn won 7 out the first 10 iron bowls before they stopped playing dude.




AU won 7 of the first 12, but was 1-3-1 in the last 5 before the split.

Donahue was hard core. He didn't believe that teams should be allowed to have more than one man with the option to run the ball, and he didn't believe that players needed more than .50 per day for food, train fare, and lodging in Birmingham.

Honestly, though, he was a hell of a defensive coach. Those 1913 and 1914 teams were light years ahead of their southern competition.
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 2:38 pm
Posted by TheGusBus34
New Orleans, LA
Member since Oct 2014
1635 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:36 pm to
So Auburn was 7-3-1 and Bama was 3-7-1...like I said auburn was kicking that tail.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter