quote:
Teh others were named by obscure publications. I mean we can all find more titles if we look for anybody and everybody that named us National Champions.

As I said before, you're really not knowledgeable enough to command my time, but I will note as I am sure you are not aware of, Auburn was named the national champ by more selectors than anyone in 1983.

People who try to say AU was not the true champ in 1983 are either ignorant or have an agenda. This is not even an opinion. It is an objective fact when considering the 1983 season. Period.

This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:17 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgsLife

Member since Jun 2013

59016 posts

Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:27 am to Tiger n Miami AU83

quote:
As I said before, you're really not knowledgeable enough to command my time,

And yet, here we are for the second or third day.

quote:
Auburn was named the national champ by more selectors than anyone in 1983.

And you still don't get it. it isn't a popularity contest. It isn't determined by the number of publications. It is determined by the accepted method. Did the AP or UPI name them Champions?

quote:
People who try to say AU was not the true champ in 1983 are either ignorant or have an agenda.

Aren't you the one that just got through saying you were not claiming those years? And yet you say this?.

ETA
And by the way...Miami was named National Champions by more publications than Auburn was. (Miami was also named NC by the AP and UPI...the accepted sources.
On the bright side, the New York Times named Auburn.