Started By
Message

re: The other no-call during the game-tying touchdown

Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:44 pm to
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

By noting it in both the title and thread?


It's not that you did it.. it's that you're ignoring context... the hold on that play changed nothing. You *scored* a touchdown... so if we're going to ignore the false start on that play *and* ignore the false start on the punt block, but correctly call the other penalties... you get:

Punt blocked (no offsides call made - False start ignored per your instructions) - UGA ball 1st down on the 18ish...

Declined defensive holding penalty, Bama still scores touchdown...

Net result, UGA has extra redzone possession that likely results in at least +3 points...



It just seems that if you were going to try and go down this road, it would be to point out something that would have substantively changed the results of a play.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter