Started By
Message

re: Greg Schiano reps want Tenerse to pay for backing out

Posted on 11/26/17 at 8:11 pm to
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 11/26/17 at 8:11 pm to
If the rumor about an MOU is true, UT might pay a little to avoid litigation. GS will argue the MOU was binding and likely make arguments about it being common in the industry for coaches to work under an MOU for months before all of the terms of a formal contact are worked out, etc., etc.

UT will argue the language of the MOU likely spells out that it is non-binding.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65515 posts
Posted on 11/26/17 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

GS will argue the MOU was binding and likely make arguments about it being common in the industry for coaches to work under an MOU for months before all of the terms of a formal contact are worked out, etc., etc.

well that's all well and good in some situations, and he's probably right. But he hasn't even stepped foot on Tennessee's campus yet or worked a day representing himself as a UT employee. He basically negotiated a contract that never got signed. He really has nothing except being pissed it fell through.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter