re: Malik Zaire named the starter against Missouri.

quote:

---

We were missing Davis and Toney but we played one of the worst defenses in college football.

---

We're one of the worst offenses in the country. And no, we were missing: Davis, Toney, Callaway, Scarlett and both defensive captains along with several other key players while playing on the road after a scandalous week.

It's like you guys have no idea that this is college football and that they're a bunch of young players.

We're down 21 scholarships, that's worse than probation.

I'm sorry I don't think your boy Franks is a good quarterback because he fricking isn't. Zaire has no weapons on offense, Franks had two of the most electric freshmen out there helping him out and that matters.

You want to throw Franks out there so he can eat bags of dicks, be my guest. He hasn't looked good outside of one quarter all season and that was against Vanderbilt.

If we have no Toney/Davis, the only playmaker left is Davis and his legs.

21 Scholarships down is not an excuse, especially when they're at the most important parts of offense and defense.

Two starting defensive linemen.

Both starting safeties.

Two starting Linebackers.

Two more defensive linemen.

Our most productive receivers outside of Cleveland.

BOTH of our most productive running backs.

Our most productive QB in the system left behind.

Asking any team to overcome all of those missing players COMBINED with losing their head coach?

And you think it's telling that Zaire isn't good because he's had to deal with that while Franks had a fraction of that shitshow to deal with?

You have zero idea of what you're talking about, and more obsessed with being right (that's why you always fall back on prior arguments) than you do of looking at the reality:

Under Zaire, we have only had a broken team who lost all of its seniority and its coach. Franks didn't have that problem for the last four weeks.