quote:
They are basically Auburn without having played Clemson. Both teams are being made to look better than they really are by a really down SEC.

Any of Richt's mid 90s UGA teams, except 06, and the 2012 would beat this UGA team.

You might be right....but there is a difference with this team. At least on defense. In the past our defense would go for a Sports Center highlight hit on a ball carrier. Now we have 5-6 layers going to the ball and hitting the ball carrier. I think you are right, that we have not truly been tested, but they seem different to me. It's been awhile since we truly blew out another team, even when we should have. I absolutely believe we will know more after Auburn and Florida, though.

ETA
Just registered about you mid 90's statement. He came in 2001, I believe....however, I'm sure you meant his early teams, which is a legit point.

This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:39 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RandySavage

Member since May 2012

30914 posts

Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:38 am to DawgsLife

I'm not knocking UGA, I just think you are underestimating how putrid UT is and even though MSU felt like a big game they've been exposed badly as well. They barely won against the one decent team they played and even that team was 4-8 last year.

It's not your fault the East is terrible and you're doing what you should do to bad teams and I would be pumped if I were a UGA fan as well but you still don't have a QB that your coaches totally trust and those teams I mentioned didn't have any of those issues except for the head scratching loss each year to an average team.

4 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board