You are having a hard time comprehending. You are saying the "NFL does period" as an answer to "Who is allowing sacks and less yards per carry to non elite talent at sub par schools."...

Now you are saying I have stated he isn't proven when CLEARLY I stated HE was, but HE isn't what makes the runs possible. I even explained that to the extreme saying "Let him RUN without blocks being thrown for him" which pointed out your OL.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by JayDeerTay84

Texas

Member since May 2013

9847 posts

Posted on 9/10/17 at 1:35 pm to MButterfly

quote:
You are having a hard time comprehending. You are saying the "NFL does period" as an answer to "Who is allowing sacks and less yards per carry to non elite talent at sub par schools."...

NO I said we have Elite talent. We do. I never said we haven't missed a few blocks in a new scheme this year.

You are just trying to find a "got-ya" moment.

quote:
Now you are saying I have stated he isn't proven when CLEARLY I stated HE was, but HE isn't what makes the runs possible. I even explained that to the extreme saying "Let him RUN without blocks being thrown for him" which pointed out your OL.

What are you rambling about now?

Let me recap what YOU said...

quote:
quote:
Guice is a PROVEN SEC back. Use whatever numbers you want to make you feel better.

True.... but the last time I viewed a game, a RB production was contingent on more than just his ability. Direct snap to him and tell the center to not block and I assure you it will be PROVEN he can't run.

Using your logic, he should still be averaging 7.8 yards per carry. He's not. So he is no longer as PROVEN?

I said Guice was a proven SEC back. He is. The BYU game nor last nights game have anything to do with what Guice has shown on the field vs the SEC.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board