re: Will Lying Leo ever play another down at MSU?

For those who wish to know how the COI can launch an investigation. First, they would get the testimony of Leo Lewis and ask him about payments from other schools. If he said yes and gave details, based on his testimony, they would amend the NOA on Ole Miss. Then they would order the investigation. Anyway, if Lewis got up there and said yes, I received money from other schools the NCAA would just sit there? In your dreams! Here are the procedures: DIVISION I COMMITTEE ON INFRACTIONS: INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES
July 19, 2017
19.7.4. If the amendment is immaterial to the allegation and agreed to by all parties
affected by the allegation, the enforcement staff shall submit an errata
memorandum detailing the nature of the change and the amended pages from the
notice of allegations to OCOI for submission to the assigned panel. If the proposed
amendment reflects a material change to the allegation or the parties do not agree
as to the materiality of the amendment, the enforcement staff shall send a written
request to the OCOI to schedule a conference call with the chief hearing officer and
all affected parties.
If the chief hearing officer determines that the proposed modification is material,
an amended notice of allegations shall be filed. If the chief hearing officer
determines in writing that the proposed amendment is immaterial, the enforcement
staff shall issue the amended pages of the notice of allegations, without change to
the case processing timelines. The affected involved individual and the institution
may supplement their respective responses consistent with Bylaw 19.7.2.
(Effective: 8/1/2013, Adopted: 8/8/2013)
3-12-3-1. Response to Withdrawn or Amended Notice of Allegations. An
amended notice of allegations shall be issued containing any changes.
If the amendment is immaterial and the parties agree, then a response is
not needed. If the amendment is material, the institution or involved
individuals may submit a response consistent with Bylaw 19.7.2.
(Effective: 8/1/2013, Adopted: 8/8/2013)
3-12-3-2. Reopening Investigation and New Allegations. If the enforcement
staff reopens an investigation after filing a notice of allegations, the
enforcement staff shall file a notice setting forth its need for re-opening
the investigation, whether it is possible to keep the hearing date, if
assigned, and a statement that the enforcement staff has notified all
parties as soon as practicable without compromising the re-opened
investigation. If the case has assigned to a panel, the notice should be
addressed to the chief hearing officer or if the case has not been assigned
to a panel, the chair. The notice shall be served on all parties and
provided to the OCOI. If the case was assigned to a panel prior to filing
the notice, the case may or may not be heard by the same panel. For
purposes of case and docket management, the COI considers the case as
closed during reinvestigation. If further investigation leads to new
allegations, the enforcement staff shall comply with the bylaws and
IOPs that flow from an amended or new notice of allegations. If no new
or amended allegations arise from reopening the investigation, the
enforcement staff shall promptly file a notice requesting the matter be
scheduled for hearing or decision. (Effective: 8/1/2013, Adopted