quote:
Well, since you brought it up

.500 = Kentuckys bowl winning percentage
.484 = Missouris bowl winning percentage

Clearly UK is better

You are sounding like Tennessee's "Life Champions" ™ when you try and act like Missouri is so superior to Kentucky in football. They are both "average" football teams at best.

Apples to Apples

~ Both are around .500 all time
~ Neither has produced a Heisman winner
~ Both have around 200 NFL draft picks (UK did have a #1 pick tho)
~ Both have around 1.5 dozen NFL 1st round draft picks
~ Both have around a dozen All Americans

While nobody is arguing Missouri may hold a slight edge in most of these numbers it is not like it is a commanding edge like say Alabama dominating Missouri OR Kentucky in these categories.

Both around .500? Please, Mizzou is .545 and over 100 wins over the .500 mark all time. Kentucky is actually below .500 all time and has a losing all time record. Those two percentages are not even remotely close.

quote:
Apples to Oranges

+ Missouri clearly has more conference championships but they played in the old Big 6 and Big 8 with the likes of Kansas, Kansas State (sans wizard), and Iowa State and only to real competitors in Nebraska and Oklahoma. Kentucky played in the SEC with "The Six" and 6 > 2.
+ Missouri has played in more bowl games but that is expected when you have fewer top teams in your conference historically.
+ Missouri has been in the polls more because they could stand out more in their historic conference while UK has had to compete with "the six" year in and year out.

bullshite. Mizzou came in and won a division twice and won 11 and 12 games along with two new years day bowl games since being in the SEC. Kentucky has done what they always do which is failing to win more than 7 games and barely make a bowl game most years. This argument works when you try and defend your shitty program from outside the SEC but Mizzou has played 5 years in the SEC now. Im going to go with the fact that Kentucky is just really really bad at football and not that you have been some good program historically that has just been kept down by the "quality of the SEC". Do you really think people believe your bullshite?

Missouri vs Kentucky in all the metrics that matter; congrats on being terrible UK.