Started By
Message

re: I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!)

Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:37 pm to
Thanks for the clarification. I understand that Merkel does not concern you, and that is fine. I have seen one poster assert rather strongly that Merkel does have a copy. If he does, perhaps it should be of concern as it evidences more disregard for the rules. It could be mere speculation that there is a copy in Merkel's hand. Hopefully it is just speculation.

I would assume there is enough information about the alleged defamatory statements in the public domain for Merkel to base his suit upon, but it would be troubling if someone did actually give him a copy of confidential statements.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 9:39 pm
Posted by VivaZapata27
Natchez, Ms
Member since Apr 2013
3573 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:41 pm to
It may well be that every party named in the NOA is privy to all of that information. I would not be surprised if Merkel has those documents since [student athlete39] has made claims against his client and his client is implicated in the NOA.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 9:42 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter