Started By
Message
re: I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!)
Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:37 pm to VivaZapata27
Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:37 pm to VivaZapata27
Thanks for the clarification. I understand that Merkel does not concern you, and that is fine. I have seen one poster assert rather strongly that Merkel does have a copy. If he does, perhaps it should be of concern as it evidences more disregard for the rules. It could be mere speculation that there is a copy in Merkel's hand. Hopefully it is just speculation.
I would assume there is enough information about the alleged defamatory statements in the public domain for Merkel to base his suit upon, but it would be troubling if someone did actually give him a copy of confidential statements.
I would assume there is enough information about the alleged defamatory statements in the public domain for Merkel to base his suit upon, but it would be troubling if someone did actually give him a copy of confidential statements.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 8/20/17 at 9:41 pm to tigerinridgeland
It may well be that every party named in the NOA is privy to all of that information. I would not be surprised if Merkel has those documents since [student athlete39] has made claims against his client and his client is implicated in the NOA.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 9:42 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News