Started By
Message

re: Houston Nutt never wanted an "apology"

Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:16 am to
Posted by Ole Messcort
Member since Aug 2017
1752 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:16 am to
quote:

Problem is that Nutt is going to have a hard time proving damages.


No he won't. They already have Freeze calling as an "anonymous source" to media members (Wyatt, Forde and others) and intentionally lying to them about the violations being all pre-Freeze and to say they were under Nutt. They already have that. Nutt has already won and Ole Miss just won't accept it.
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 8/4/17 at 8:11 am to
That he can prove a breach of contract, assuming that Mars is correct about the terms, is one thing. Proving beyond speculation that the breach actually damaged his prospects for getting a coaching job will be more difficult. Nutt went without a coaching job for several years before the "sources" threw him under the bus, at least in the press. That will make actual damages challenging to prove. However, he may be more successful on the punitive damage claim if he can prove the breach was in bad faith. But such damages are not available against the state, so that presumably he could recover such damages only from the foundation, which seems to unlikely unless the foundation was the employer of the sources.

So, yes, I think he has a substantial chance of winning the suit, again if Mars' construction of the contract is correct, but a large award of actual damages may be unlikely. And it is unlikely that a large punitive damage award could be obtained against the foundation .
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 8:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter