Started By
Message
re: Position U
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:34 pm to 1BamaRTR
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:34 pm to 1BamaRTR
The Heismans thing is meaningless. For most of the history of the award it was all politics. Regional bias in Heisman voting is well documented, and the South was ignored for a long time. Certain schools, USC included, were given bias in the voting. In the 60s for example West Coast bias was strong in Heisman voting. From 62-70 the Pac-8 won 5 Heismans, 2 of which were USC RBs.
1
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:42 pm to BowlJackson
Oh please, if it was the other way around you'd be boasting about AU's numerous Heisman RBs.
But USC still has 10 CFB HOF RBs compared to AU's 3 and 3 Pro FB HOF RBs to AU's zero. I guess you'll claim bias there as well.
But USC still has 10 CFB HOF RBs compared to AU's 3 and 3 Pro FB HOF RBs to AU's zero. I guess you'll claim bias there as well.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News