Started By
Message
re: Position U
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:24 pm to BowlJackson
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:24 pm to BowlJackson
He still won the award originally. We are talking about on-field performance in this thread.
The question is who has had the better the RBs? Not who has had the most upstanding RBs.
But if you want to get all technical. USC technically has 4 Heisman RBs to AU's 1 and 10 CFB HOF RBs to AU's 3.
The question is who has had the better the RBs? Not who has had the most upstanding RBs.
But if you want to get all technical. USC technically has 4 Heisman RBs to AU's 1 and 10 CFB HOF RBs to AU's 3.
1
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:34 pm to 1BamaRTR
The Heismans thing is meaningless. For most of the history of the award it was all politics. Regional bias in Heisman voting is well documented, and the South was ignored for a long time. Certain schools, USC included, were given bias in the voting. In the 60s for example West Coast bias was strong in Heisman voting. From 62-70 the Pac-8 won 5 Heismans, 2 of which were USC RBs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News