Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 6/24/17 at 2:20 am to
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5036 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 2:20 am to
If a program is on probation from a previous year finding and is having a national championship caliber season, I see nothing wrong.

Oklahoma was on major probation in 1973 and 1974 for an incident that was the result of the 1972 season. At the time, the AP didn't care. OU was the best team and only undefeated team in 1974 despite a bowl ban but ultimately won the AP.

Had the AP followed their same theme in 1993, Auburn and FSU are co-national champions.

When you are the only undefeated team in a P5 conference pre-NC game era, you have a legit claim.
Posted by Cobb Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
9804 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 10:10 am to
quote:

If a program is on probation from a previous year finding and is having a national championship caliber season, I see nothing wrong.

Oklahoma was on major probation in 1973 and 1974 for an incident that was the result of the 1972 season. At the time, the AP didn't care. OU was the best team and only undefeated team in 1974 despite a bowl ban but ultimately won the AP.

Had the AP followed their same theme in 1993, Auburn and FSU are co-national champions. Wee

When you are the only undefeated team in a P5 conference pre-NC game era, you have a legit claim.


Doesn't said team still unfairly benefit, maybe even more so, from the transgression(s), a year or more after the occurance(s). Auburn, for example, claims a NC the year after Newton was recruited. And it was the only year that he was at Auburn.
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 10:12 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter