Started By
Message

re: Let's say the Leo Lewis stuff is thrown out by the NCAA

Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:55 pm to
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Leo withdrawing his testimony is a big deal


why would he? if it's true, which the only ones who think it isn't are connected to Ole Miss, then he just repeats it in testimony. You know, the burden in this case is on the plaintiff, not the defendant. It's not really a winning case for RR. It's just tough to prove the things he's alleged are wrong.
Posted by Pickle_Weasel
Member since Mar 2016
3819 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

It's just tough to prove the things he's alleged are wrong.


If you believe that, you either haven't actually read anything but t/rant or are just trolling.

The only thing concerning Leo that Ole Miss is guilty of is free rides and free meals. The other shite can be disproven. But I know, facts that disprove his stories are just "minor details", such as:
1. His claim of being the first person in history is be in two places at once.
2. His claim of seeing things that do not and never have existed.
3. His claim of people that don't exist.
4. His claim of how he got paid that kept changing over and over and over and over.
5. The fact that his timelines do NOT add up at all.
6. His claim of all of that merchandise that suddenly vanished completely and nobody ever saw it and he couldn't explain where it went.
7. His mom even calling him a liar about the supposed money he received from more than one SEC school (seriously - dude's mom called him out on that....lol)
8. His claim of meeting boosters, in which the boosters can verify they weren't even in Oxford when he claimed.

Yeah, facts = just minor details. Ole Miss fricked, death penalty, yada yada yada.......

Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64806 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It's just tough to prove the things he's alleged are wrong.


It's easy to prove that they don't use security tags.
It's easy to prove that they didn't have an employee by the name of Emily.
It's easy to prove that no gift cards were used on the dates and for the amounts specified by Leo Lewis during his testimony.


quote:

which the only ones who think it isn't are connected to Ole Miss



Well obviously that's because the people that can disprove Leo's claim are connected to Ole MIss.
Posted by DeathPenalty
H-Town
Member since Apr 2016
399 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Leo withdrawing his testimony is a big deal


So Leo tricked OM into self imposing penalties? Leo one smart cookie.
Posted by D500MAG
Oklahoma
Member since Oct 2010
3737 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:38 pm to
OM and fans can't even see the set up here. Just like OM , the NCAA wants this phase over with.

The court case starting up will provide the perfect excuse for the NCAA to revisit OM in a couple years.

OM got caught while under investigation. Did OM completely clean everything up?

Two words describe OM's future

Repeat Offender
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter