Started By
Message
Posted on 5/17/17 at 4:35 pm to jangalang
quote:
His point wasn't even fricking vague.
I wouldn't call it vague as much as I'd call it dumb and illogical. Surely you'd agree with that, or are you too big of a homer to call one of your own out?
He claimed Bama was clinging to the UT rivalry strictly due to Bama's historical success over UT. However, UT enjoys the second best win percentage over Bama of all SEC teams. And they lost first place only in the last year or two of this absurd 10 game streak, which is obviously an anomaly. So there is no 'historical success' explanation in Bama clinging to a series in which it underperforms so significantly. Just admit your bro said something dumb in his weak flame attempt and move on, no big deal really.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News