Started By
Message
re: Missouri football has been more relevant than LSU since expansion.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 10:14 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 5/12/17 at 10:14 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Challenging for a conference championship at a minimum.
Well the year they played LSU they didn't. So maybe they just have had an easier route. And it shows because they didn't challenge for shite in the actual seccg. Play LSU those years, would have been an auto loss.
Is LSU the only school to not have lost to an expansion team? I think so, the rest of the sec needs to get their shite together.
This post was edited on 5/12/17 at 10:17 am
1
Posted on 5/12/17 at 10:30 am to dgnx6
quote:
So maybe they just have had an easier route.
Maybe. But simply having an "easier route" doesn't win you 12 games and earn a Top 5 ranking. Their strength of schedule that year was #12. One spot behind LSU. The following year (11 wins), their strength of schedule was still Top 25.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News