Started By
Message
re: Heroes, Red Arrows, 'n Gimps. . .
Posted on 1/29/17 at 9:45 pm to Jefferson Dawg
Posted on 1/29/17 at 9:45 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Please give us your or their definition of the word "terrorist" then..
I really want to see the dishonest pathetic lengths someone would have to go through to label Washington or Lee as "terrorists". Or how they could say that sherman, guevera, or lincoln weren't.
This level of stupidity is scary, to be honest.
What's really scary is that some people respond to posts without reading or understanding them.
I said that the British considered Washington a traitor and a terrorist. He rebelled against the king and introduced gorilla warfare. Ever read a history book? I said that R.E. Lee was considered a traitor by the North. Ever read Lee's history? He was an officer in the US Army before he became a general in the CSA. Think he was a hero to the north?
The level of stupidity or lack of reading comprehension by some of our fan base is embarrassing to me as a UGA grad.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 10:01 pm
2
Posted on 1/30/17 at 9:53 am to Cobb Dawg
quote:
The level of stupidity or lack of reading comprehension by some of our fan base is embarrassing to me as a UGA grad.
You typed the word "terrorist" three times in your post, did you not? But then when asked for your definition of the word "terrorist.....you cowardly run away from those comments and try and downplay and hide from your idiotic "terrorist" comparison.
Basically, you doubled-down on the stupidity by adding some dishonesty. Instead of defending your actual post that is there for anyone to read. Congrats.
Also, Lee's country wasnt the United States or the Confederate States. His country was Virginia. That never changed.so. Again. Please explain to us how Washington and Lee could be considered terrorists by anyone north, british, anyone. (And guerilla warfare doesnt make someone a terrorist mongoloid)
Posted on 1/30/17 at 8:50 pm to Cobb Dawg
quote:
I said that the British considered Washington a traitor and a terrorist. He rebelled against the king and introduced gorilla warfare. Ever read a history book?
That's a lot of error in a short paragraph. Most obvious: guerrilla, not gorilla.
Washington didn't really use guerrilla tactics - he led the Continental Army and fought main force actions. Further, he damned sure didn't "introduce" guerrilla tactics to North America. The Indians, and groups like Roberts Rangers had already done it well before. Plus, the Brits had faced such tactics in Scotland, Ireland, and India long before, too.
The Brits did consider him a traitor, but generally speaking, an honorable one. He wasn't viewed as a terrorist, as he fought military engagements.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News