Started By
Message

re: Why did we let Mizzou in the SEC?

Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:27 am to
Posted by TigerTalker16
Columbia,MO
Member since Apr 2015
11533 posts
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Missouri was brought in strictly for media purposes. Gaining a footprint in the STL and KC marketplaces was the one and only reason they were brought in.

Not true. We also have a solid basketball program which is something the SEC needed a boost in but then Kim Anderson happened and we are now going through the worst run in program history.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:46 am to
quote:

We also have a solid basketball program
You do realize we've had two good seasons this century?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter