Started By
Message
re: Why did we let Mizzou in the SEC?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:24 am to LewDawg
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:24 am to LewDawg
Missouri was brought in strictly for media purposes. Gaining a footprint in the STL and KC marketplaces was the one and only reason they were brought in.
How they perform on the field and/or court has nothing to do with it.
How they perform on the field and/or court has nothing to do with it.
This post was edited on 1/14/17 at 11:26 am
1
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:27 am to Godawgs4
quote:
Missouri was brought in strictly for media purposes. Gaining a footprint in the STL and KC marketplaces was the one and only reason they were brought in.
Not true. We also have a solid basketball program which is something the SEC needed a boost in but then Kim Anderson happened and we are now going through the worst run in program history.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News