quote:
Right because NFL GM's want 28 year old injury proned RB's on their rosters. Did you fall out of the stupid tree and hit every branch going down?

So the whole "HE PLAYED FOR THE BROWNS THOUGH" thing isn't actually a thing at all, then?

My guess is the whole he averaged 3.9 YPC his last 3 years (2012-2014) in the NFL is the reason nobody wants him. Since that's, you know, shitty.

Mark Ingram has averaged 4.7 YPC his last 4 years (2012-2016), FYI. Probably why he is still a starting running back in the NFL. Just my guess.

This post was edited on 12/19/16 at 8:37 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by jangalang

Member since Dec 2014

37214 posts

Posted on 12/19/16 at 8:48 am to Triple Daves

quote:
So the whole "HE PLAYED FOR THE BROWNS THOUGH" thing isn't actually a thing at all, then? My guess is the whole he averaged 3.9 YPC his last 3 years (2012-2014) in the NFL is the reason nobody wants him. Since that's, you know, shitty. Mark Ingram has averaged 4.7 YPC his last 4 years (2012-2016), FYI. Probably why he is still a starting running back in the NFL. Just my guess.

They have the same career ypc average. Spin it all you want, both stilll have a 4.4ypc. Injuries derailed Tate's career causing his ypc to slip. Tate played in run focused offenses and with shitty QBs.
Ingram has survived in a pass happy offense alongside Drew Brees for years. Ingram has 850 yards right now and y'all act like he is over 1300 at this point.
I'm glad Mark Ingram turned his NFL career around. At one point, it was his last contract year, and the organization was ready to cut him...

This post was edited on 12/19/16 at 8:51 am

2 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board