re: Is the CFP Committee pushing an agenda?

quote:

---

I think they are setting up here is a Final 4 with 2 B1G team

---

DING DING DING

Winner . Winner . Chicken . Dinner

The CFP was a direct response to the SEC dominance in the BCS model. i stated on here several times the CFP would never have 2 SEC schools but in the 1st decade we would see 2 B1G schools. Here we are in year 3 of the CFP and they have been pushing Ohio State and Michigan as 2 of the 4 in the CFP from the pre season.

quote:

---

I mean hell they would only be screwing Louisville and Washington/Clemson

---

Not one to defend Taters or Line Beards but they deserve a shot before a 2nd B1G team. The bottom 8 to 10 teams of the B1G still suck balls and to act like they don't is to be under the spell of the B1G marketing machine. SEC east may be down but I would still say the bottom half of the SEC would beat the bottom half of the B1G like 7-0 or 6-1.

Here is a sample match up of bottom ten

(3-3) Tennessee vs (5-2) Nebraska
(4-4) Georgia vs (4-3) Minnesota
(4-4) Kentucky vs (4-3) Iowa
(4-3) Texas A&M vs (4-3) Northwestern
(3-5) South Carolina vs (3-4) Indiana
(2-4) Arkansas vs (2-5) Maryland
(2-4) Ole Miss vs (2-5) Illinois
(2-4) Mississippi State vs (1-6) Michigan State
(1-5) Vanderbilt vs (1-6) Purdue
(1-5) Missouri vs (0-7) Rutgers