Started By
Message
re: Is the CFP Committee pushing an agenda?
Posted on 11/16/16 at 1:09 am to MoarKilometers
Posted on 11/16/16 at 1:09 am to MoarKilometers
Western Michigan has (2) B1G wins and the B1G has two of the top 4 spots in the CFP. Committee has been working hard to squeeze 2 B1G schools into the CFP even tho they will not do the same for the SEC.
Ohio State has 2 real games so far this season and a loss to Penn State
W @ Oklahoma
W @ Wisconsin
Michigan had 1 real game vs Wisconsin and lost to Iowa. Played 1st five games at home and will play 8 of 12 games at home for the season.
Sparty is down and feeding on the likes of Rutgers, Purdue, Maryland, Illinois, and the rest of the crippled children greatly inflates the B1G profiles. Funny how the BCS gets replaced by the CFP and suddenly the B1G is back in the hunt.
Ohio State has 2 real games so far this season and a loss to Penn State
W @ Oklahoma
W @ Wisconsin
Michigan had 1 real game vs Wisconsin and lost to Iowa. Played 1st five games at home and will play 8 of 12 games at home for the season.
Sparty is down and feeding on the likes of Rutgers, Purdue, Maryland, Illinois, and the rest of the crippled children greatly inflates the B1G profiles. Funny how the BCS gets replaced by the CFP and suddenly the B1G is back in the hunt.
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:02 am to Cheese Grits
Ohio St also clobbered Nebraska. And Michigan also beat Colorado. Other than Bama, there is not an SEC team that has a resume that would justify ranking them above Penn State, Wisc, Mich or OSU. There's no B1G-biased agenda. In the end there will probably only be One B1G team in the top four, and that will most likely be Ohio St.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)