Started By
Message
re: Woody Barrett????
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:30 am to awestruck
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:30 am to awestruck
quote:
So who's next man up? Woody, Jeremy, Tyler.... or the one who couldn't get it done against Vandy?
JF3 lead to 10 points against Vandy. They were moving the ball just fine. He just had two turnovers. And Vandy beat that shitty team we lost to Saturday, so I wouldn't say too much about that. If you think for a second that JF3 wouldn't have at least been able to pick up a few first downs and get in field goal position Saturday, Idk what to tell you.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:52 am to jvilletiger25
quote:
quote:
So who's next man up? Woody, Jeremy, Tyler.... or the one who couldn't get it done against Vandy?
JF3 lead to 10 points against Vandy. They were moving the ball just fine. He just had two turnovers. And Vandy beat that shitty team we lost to Saturday, so I wouldn't say too much about that. If you think for a second that JF3 wouldn't have at least been able to pick up a few first downs and get in field goal position Saturday, Idk what to tell you.
nice try - and the two up votes
Yes, you may not know... (ie. the Idk)... although it's certainly nice to have you publicly acknowledge this out loud.
Because contrary to what I or you or the next guy's farce may be ... the truth was on game day Gus and/or Rhett thought otherwise of your assertion... that jf3 would get the job done and would have been better than the guy they selected. Even given we have the 20/20 benefit of knowing such a belief cost us a win, it does not mean it was erroneous to not have played him or for you to unequivalently state a change of event would have transpired.
Butt hurt and lack of reason aside ... you're claiming divine knowledge does not fit the argument very well.
edit: down to up
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 10:54 am
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News