Started By
Message

re: LSU only SEC school that raises more donations for athletics than for academics

Posted on 10/31/16 at 1:56 pm to
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6787 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

The graph points out that LSU is the only school in the SEC that gets more donations to the athletic fund than their academic fund. That is an embarrassing travesty.


The article is a huge embarrassment for LSU for sure, but really it's an indictment of all of southern culture. We're always seeing some bleeding heart whining about how much the football coach gets paid compared to the school president (or something along those lines), but I think most of us on here are savvy enough to understand that argument is weak. Having a successful and well funded athletic program works wonders for SEC schools, resulting in enormous financial windfalls and increased applicant pools. It's kind of a fricked up model, but it works in the South. So the problem isn't really the schools, it's the alumns and fans who don't give enough shits about the actual education side of things to adequately fund it.

And on top of citizens with misplaced priorities, in states like Alabama and Louisiana you have to deal with utterly dysfunctional local governments mismanaging funds and priorities. A state like Louisiana shouldn't be broke. You've got a truly international arts, entertainment, and culinary tourist destination in NO, its shipping industry, fishing industry, and all of that oil. But it can fund the state's flagship university? That is fricked up and there's no way around it.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

The article is a huge embarrassment for LSU for sure, but really it's an indictment of all of southern culture. We're always seeing some bleeding heart whining about how much the football coach gets paid compared to the school president (or something along those lines), but I think most of us on here are savvy enough to understand that argument is weak. Having a successful and well funded athletic program works wonders for SEC schools, resulting in enormous financial windfalls and increased applicant pools. It's kind of a fricked up model, but it works in the South. So the problem isn't really the schools, it's the alumns and fans who don't give enough shits about the actual education side of things to adequately fund it.

And on top of citizens with misplaced priorities, in states like Alabama and Louisiana you have to deal with utterly dysfunctional local governments mismanaging funds and priorities. A state like Louisiana shouldn't be broke. You've got a truly international arts, entertainment, and culinary tourist destination in NO, its shipping industry, fishing industry, and all of that oil. But it can fund the state's flagship university? That is fricked up and there's no way around it.

I'm going to have to agree with everything you posted here.

So many people in the South LOVE their college football teams but HATE their colleges. I've never understood this mentality.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127589 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

But it can fund the state's flagship university? That is fricked up and there's no way around it.



There's like 10 other 4 year universities to fund though.
Posted by Snout Spout
Somewhere in the 17th century
Member since Jul 2015
958 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

A state like Louisiana shouldn't be broke. You've got a truly international arts, entertainment, and culinary tourist destination in NO, its shipping industry, fishing industry, and all of that oil.


How does a state get funding from those things you mentioned without taxing them? There's your problem.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter