Started By
Message
re: Why do Bama RBs grossly under perform at the next level?
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:19 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:19 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Damn. Those are some shitty LSU running backs. Jeremy Hill cost his team a shot at the Super Bowl last year. Sad.
Also, I didn't realize that Bama really does have twice as many RBs in the league as LSU. Incredible
Come on, Tuscaloser. Answer the question before the night is over.
Why can't the UA RBs find the same success in the NFL as they did in college?
Or Keep:
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 12:30 am
1
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:24 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Come on, Tuscaloser. Answer the question before the night is over.
Why can't the AU RBs find the same success in the NFL as they did in college?
I don't know anything about Auburn RBs.
What I do know is that the NFL is a passing league, which doesn't lend itself to seeing eye popping stats from RBs very often. Last season, only 7 of the 32 RBs hit the 1,000 yard mark. That was the lowest number in 25 years. You also see a lot more teams moving away from having a featured back, in favor of splitting carries, in an effort to extend their players' careers and productivity.
Those are the real answers you're not really looking for. I'm going to sleep. Roll Tide.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News