Started By
Message
re: Why do Bama RBs grossly under perform at the next level?
Posted on 10/26/16 at 11:40 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/26/16 at 11:40 pm to Tuscaloosa
Just let me know when you've had enough
Please post the RB recruiting poster you have framed in your dining room.
"Perception in the NFL, would mean scouts, right, Tuscaloser?
quote:
The perception in the NFL is that players exit Tuscaloosa with bodies that have experienced potentially significant wear and tear. When it comes to the ups and downs of former Alabama running backs at the next level, the pounding they took while playing in the SEC — and while playing for Nick Saban — creates a concern that there isn’t as much tread on the tires as other players may have.
Please post the RB recruiting poster you have framed in your dining room.
"Perception in the NFL, would mean scouts, right, Tuscaloser?
This post was edited on 10/26/16 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 10/26/16 at 11:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
And yet another article that refers to Mark Ingram and Eddie Lacy as good players.
You really are retarded, aren't you?
You really are retarded, aren't you?
Posted on 10/26/16 at 11:45 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
"Perception in the NFL, would mean scouts, right, Tuscaloser?
And reading is hard, Carl. Your thread title asks why RBs "grossly under perform," while the quote you're attempting to talk shite with is addressing the "perception" that Bama backs get too many carries in college.
I'd give you a 2/10 on this thread. I think you're good enough for a 4 or 5 out of 10 if you put a little more thought into it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News