Started By
Message
re: Hard look at Kirby & Georgia?
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:33 pm to DawgsLife
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:33 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
While this may be true, I would be willing to bet that Kirby wins 75% of his games this year...his first. That would be a 9-3 season. If we can split one between Florida and Auburn we should go 9-3. It's doable this year, and I think certain next year.
9-3 should be attainable by any coach at UG with a pulse, given how consistently shitty the East is plus your recruiting advantages. It's a blessing and a curse for yall because it's hard to fire winning coaches.
3
Posted on 10/4/16 at 12:51 pm to JoJoDolphinus
quote:
should be attainable by any coach at UG with a pulse, given how consistently shitty the East is plus your recruiting advantages. It's a blessing and a curse for yall because it's hard to fire winning coaches.
Top 25 should be, but it wasn't for richt over the recent ten years.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 1:32 pm to JoJoDolphinus
quote:
quote: While this may be true, I would be willing to bet that Kirby wins 75% of his games this year...his first. That would be a 9-3 season. If we can split one between Florida and Auburn we should go 9-3. It's doable this year, and I think certain next year. 9-3 should be attainable by any coach at UG with a pulse, given how consistently shitty the East is plus your recruiting advantages. It's a blessing and a curse for yall because it's hard to fire winning coaches.
So by description Richt was:
Coach without a pulse in - 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013
Coach with a pulse in - 2008, 2015
Did a good job in - 2007, 2011, 2012, 2014
Now you might be understanding why we want more than a "coach with a pulse or worse" 60% of the time.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 4:45 pm to JoJoDolphinus
quote:
9-3 should be attainable by any coach at UG with a pulse, given how consistently shitty the East is plus your recruiting advantages. It's a blessing and a curse for yall because it's hard to fire winning coaches.
Maybe, maybe not. That's an argument for another thread. What i was responding to was the comment that almost every great coach managed to win at least 75% of their games by their second year. I was merely pointing out that Smart probably would too.....in his first year. Now, you, and others can argue all you want to about advantages and disadvantages, but that was not mentioned in the posters post.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News