Started By
Message

re: BJJ Competitions, and why I hate them.

Posted on 9/20/16 at 12:14 am to
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 12:14 am to
quote:

-The only passer-by in this thread agreed with me and noted your inability to comprehend.


And when pressed for content was inability to produce.

quote:

-I shared a link from an mma forum were all the posters agreed with me and it wasn't even a debate, it was more people laughing off the position you took in the OP.


His objection is much more simplified because he actually doesn't know grappling -- to which I do. So my question still stands: Why is getting dropped on your head by an uchi mata any different than getting dropped on your head by a wrestling spike?

Also, a black-belt responded in the same thread and sort of agreed with you, while dismantling the position altogether.

quote:

anyone can do it, you only really see it in the white belt division, because by blue belt people will get the right angle on the triangle to break the persons posture and hook the leg if the guy tries to lift them.
-- Which was my position from the very beginning.

Don't like being slammed? Learn to defend against slams, because it's literally the first thing someone untrained in any form of grappling (or a traditional wrestler) does.

I just disagree with the premise, it's a legitimate technique and should be worked into BJJ competition as it is absolutely a takedown and works in breaking a triangle.

Change the rule: If someone can lift your head above their knee, stand them up again.

It reminds me of when the Brazilians didn't want anyone to do leglocks anywhere at any level at any time because they thought it was too progressive.

''Leglocks in Brazilian jiu-jitsu are a relatively new phenomenon. It wasn’t that long ago that a person could get booed off the mats for submitting their opponent via leglock in a BJJ tournament. ''

So just to sum this up because I'm going to be brutally misrepresented as you tilt at your windmills:

My point, TL;DR: I think slamming is a part of the combat sport, just like all of the Judo throws that put you on your head. To keep people safe, they should make it so that when you lift someone above your knee during a submission they're stood up again.

Thanks for getting back on topic.
Posted by Supreme Tiger
Member since Sep 2016
642 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 11:09 am to
Whoa, long reply. Didn't read bc this has been over for awhile.

Best of luck to you figuring out why you're so unhappy.

I mean that. Good luck to you.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8186 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 11:25 am to
Slamming an opponent is fine for training and practice. I am all for it. When both people understand it and take the appropriate steps to protect the long term health of the opponent. Competitions are between consenting individuals in a contest of skill but not trying to injure their opponent. You want them competitions to simulate real world events but the goal of real world events is to injure the other person or incapacitate them. One thing cannot be the other by the nature of the event.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter