Started By
Message
re: Ranking the SEC the last 10 years (2006-2015)
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:52 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:52 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
Are you suppose to be a good poster? You are all the same to me. Not one of you will even admit OM is more nationally relevant. How am I suppose to decipher which are good and bad?
3
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:54 pm to Whereisomaha
It's not a big deal what you think of me. I was just curious. 
Posted on 6/22/16 at 4:18 pm to Whereisomaha
Because Ole Miss is not more nationally relevant. But good job getting the W's by paying players to enroll in your program.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 8:49 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
admit OM is more nationally relevant
neither is nationally relevant. Both have had quality success at certain recently that put them on the cusp of being nationally relevant...
until they failed at some point and were no longer on that cusp. Which is like now and where both schools normally reside
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News